CBDC Could Spell Doom for Financial Privacy and Free Markets
The CATO Institute has released a policy analysis document warning that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) could spell doom for financial privacy of the citizens and free markets. The document mentions that it could turn out to be the "single largest assault on financial privacy since the creation of the Bank Secrecy Act." The document further seeks immediate intervention from the US Congress. The US Congress "should explicitly prohibit" its issuance to stop the US Federal Reserve and Treasury from threatening the financial system with the CBDC, it concludes.
Threat to the Citizen’s Right to Privacy
A
policy analysis document released on April 4 by the CATO Institute warns that a
central bank digital currency could be detrimental to the American people. The
analysis document points to two-thirds of the 2,052 comment letters sent to the
US Federal Reserve that oppose plans to launch a CBDC.
The
policy analysis document that is authored by Nicholas Anthony and Norbert
Michel lists some of the concerns about CBDCs that have been raised and the
associated risks that make the CBDC unsuitable for Americans. As seen in the document, one key concern raised by CBDC
opponents is the threat it poses to Americans’ right to financial privacy.
"Laws
designed to counter-terrorism, deter money laundering, and collect taxes
largely provide the government with the ability to conduct unchecked surveillance
over financial information. CBDC could spell doom for what little protection
remains because it would give the federal government complete visibility into
every financial transaction by establishing a direct link between the
government and each citizen’s financial activity," the analysis document
has stated.
While
attaining this feat is something the US government may want to do, the authors
assert that the issuance of the CBDC would amount to what they call the
"single largest assault on financial privacy since the creation of the
Bank Secrecy Act and the establishment of the third-party doctrine."
Threat to Free Markets and Platforms for Cyber Criminals
Anthony
and Michel have claimed that the CBDC is likely to be a threat to financial
freedom as well, besides being a threat to citizens’ right to privacy as
guaranteed by the US Constitution. They explain:
"A
CBDC would provide countless opportunities for the government to control
citizens’ financial transactions. Such control could be preemptive (prohibiting
and limiting purchases), behavioral (spurring and curbing purchases), or
punitive (freezing and seizing funds)."
The
policy document has also suggested that a CBDC will pose a threat to free
markets and will give cybercriminals "a prominent platform on which to
focus their efforts."
The
two authors have recommended that the US Congress "should explicitly
prohibit" the US Treasury and central bank from issuing digital currency
to prevent creating risks. The amendment to Section 13 of the Federal Reserve
Act will limit the US "Treasury’s authority to expand existing
offerings."
The
authors have also recommended that the US Congress "require that the Fed’s
compliance with the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control
Act’s cost recovery provisions be subject to regular audits by third
parties."
What
is your take on CBDC as a threat to financial privacy? Please post your
comments.
0 Comments